TARDIS iPhone Dock Pumps Out Transdimensional Tunes

LAS VEGAS — Speakal has created a dock for your iOS devices in the shape of the iconic TARDIS from Doctor Who. The bottom of the box slides out like a tray, revealing a small docking station. Speakers are built into the windows, and there’s a volume knob in the back.

CES 2011The company has also created an iOS app that turns your iPhone or iPod into a wireless remote control for your home theater, controlling the TV, stereo and DVD or Blu-ray player. The free app connects to the TARDIS via Bluetooth, and the commands are beamed to your various home theater devices using a small infrared emitter in the lamp at the top of the TARDIS.

It will be available this spring for around $130, and it will be slightly smaller than this demo unit (It’s actually bigger on the inside than it is on the outside).

Speakal has a few other official BBC-licensed products, including a dock shaped like Stig’s helmet from Top Gear. Your iPhone plugs into the top, which looks kind of silly, but it’s still a wicked cool piece of art.

See also:

  • Doctor Who Sonic Screwdriver Wiimote
  • Can Doctor Who Redeem Ebenezer Scrooge?
  • Doctor Who Sonic Screwdriver, Now Screws Screws


jQuery(‘#inf_widget’).load(‘http://www.wired.com/ajax/widgets/related/content/blogPost/gadgetlab_56801′);

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Skype for iPhone, Now With Video

Skype now does video-calling on iOS devices. The new 3.0 update allows users to make video calls not only between iDevice, but also with desktop computers, and the calls can be placed over both Wi-Fi and 3G.

To make and receive video calls, you’ll need to have an iPhone 3GS or better, and be running iOS4. If you have both front and back facing cameras, you can use either. The 3GS can only, obviously, use the rear cam.

And if you have an iPad or a last-gen iPod Touch? You’re not left out. You can still receive video calls, but of course you can’t send any video.

Skype has a big advantage over FaceTime, Apple’s own video-calling app, as pretty much everyone already uses Skype. FaceTime requires a camera-equipped iPhone or iPod Touch, or a Mac running beta software. It also only works over Wi-Fi.

This is big news, especially for people wanting to replace computers with iPads. If a camera-equipped iPad goes on sale this year, as expected, then peope like my parents could ditch their hard-to-administer PC for an iPad. Hopefully Skype’s next update will bring us a proper iPad version of the software. This update, despite adding video, still requires you to pixel-double it to get full-screen.

Skype 3 for iPhone – With Video Calling [Skype Blog]


jQuery(‘#inf_widget’).load(‘http://www.wired.com/ajax/widgets/related/content/blogPost/gadgetlab_55933′);

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Galaxy Player: Samsung’s Android ‘iPod Touch’ at CES 2011

At last, somebody, somewhere will sell a credible alternative to the iPad Touch. Ever since September 2007, Apple has had the phone-less pocket computer market to itself. This is about to change, thanks to Samsung’s Galaxy Player, a non-cell version of its super-successful Galaxy S.

Last year, Samsung got a rather crappier Galaxy-branded media player into European stores, but this on is the real deal. It sports a pair of cameras (3.2MP round back, and a VGA webcam up front), Bluetooth, GPS, a microSD card slot, a 1GHz processor and Android 2.2 Froyo.

The screen is four-inches on the diagonal, bigger than the Touch, but with a lower resolution of 800480 (the Touch boasts a 960-by-640 Retina display). The Player is also thicker than the Touch 9.9mm against 7.2mm but this is likely how Samsung manages to fit in a better camera and a removable battery.

Pricing has yet to be revealed, but we know what sizes the player will come in: 8GB, 16GB and 32GB. More to come from CES, which is less than two weeks away.

Samsung confirms Galaxy Player, will showcase at CES 2011 [Samsung Hub]


jQuery(‘#inf_widget’).load(‘http://www.wired.com/ajax/widgets/related/content/blogPost/gadgetlab_55793′);

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

IPad Five-in-One Dock Adapter: When Will the Madness End?

Just as seemingly every year the number of blades on a disposable razor inevitably increases, so every few months a new iPad dock adapter adds yet another input. In August we saw the 2-in-1 camera-connector, with USB and an SD-card slot. The just last week we were treated to the plasticky wonders of the 3-in-1 adapter, which added micrSD to the mix.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, behold the amazing, nay, astonishing 5-in-1 dock adapter. Slot this overachieving little widget into your iPad’s port and you get all of the above functions plus a mini-USB port (for charging the iPad or connecting to a computer) and an A/V-out port. This last lets you hook up an iPad (or a video-supporting iPod) to a TV.

That’s a whole lot of features packed into one small box and – if experience of these things is anything to go by it will likely break soon after buying. On the other hand, this combines a whole shopping-cart full of Apple products into one, and even ships with the A/V and USB cables needed to use it.

What next? The same manufacturer also has an unholy version that will read Sony MemorySticks, but I’m hoping for something more practical (or plain weird). Comments, please: What oddity would you like to see here? MIDI would be nice for musicians. A crappy but functional webcam would be awesome for everyone. But I’m going to vote for a USB hand-warmer. Given the iPad’s huge battery, this should last at least a day, and keep me blogging from my cold, non-heated apartment.

5-in-1 adapter product page [Anguodz via MIC Gadget]


jQuery(‘#inf_widget’).load(‘http://www.wired.com/ajax/widgets/related/content/blogPost/gadgetlab_55531′);

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Apple Patent Shows Future of Biometrics Isn’t Security

A recent Apple patent and a strongly-worded report from the National Research Council suggest that the future of biometrics lies with personalization, not security.

Last week, the US Patent and Trademark Office granted Apple, Inc. a patent for biometric-sensor handheld devices that recognize a user by the image of his/her hand. In the not-too-distant future, anyone in the house could pick up an iOS device — or a remote control, or camera — and have personalized settings queued up just for them.

The patent (which Apple first applied for in 2005) protects handheld devices with one or more “touch sensors” — buttons, touchscreens, or other interfaces — on any of the device’s surfaces. These sensors can take a pixelated image of a user’s hand, match it to a corresponding image on file, and configure the device’s software and user profile accordingly.

It’s a very different use of biometrics than we’ve seen in the movies. Hand and retina scanners have been touted for years as a futuristic gatekeepers to high-security buildings. This is usually a much-embelleshed version of their real-world use by businesses and government agencies for whom secrecy is a big deal. In the wider world, tiny fingerprint scanners have been built into laptops, but they aren’t widely used for the simple reason that they don’t work reliably enough.

But while it might be insufficient for security, biometrics might work just fine for personalization. Suppose my family shares a future-generation iPad that supports multiple user profiles and a version of this sensor technology. When my wife or I pick it up, the mail application displays each of our inboxes separately. When our young son picks it up, only games and other approved applications are available. If a guest or intruder picks it up, a guest profile would make none of your personal information immediately available to them.

Now, an important caveat: the personal profile dimension of this technology would frankly be stronger than the security implications. You could outwit a three-year-old, but not a determined hacker. You could hide a sensitive email from a snooping houseguest, but not a practiced identity or information thief.

This “soft-security” approach may actually be the right approach for technology companies to take with biometrics. Last week the National Research Council issued a report (sponsored by the CIA, DARPA, and the US Department of Homeland Security, among others) on the state of the art of automated biometric recognition security. The report argues that existing technologies as implemented are inherently fallible, and that more research and better practices were needed before they could be relied upon in high-security contexts.

Joseph N Pato, HP Labs distinguished technologist and chair of the “Whither Biometrics?” committee that wrote the report, wrote that we’ve been misled by spy-movie fantasies about palm-and-retina-scanning doors: “While some biometric systems can be effective for specific tasks, they are not nearly as infallible as their depiction in popular culture might suggest.”

Thinking for a moment about Apple’s user-sensitive iPad shows the limitations of biometric recognition systems. What if I put my hands in the wrong place, or can’t get the device to load the proper profile? What if my son grows up and his hands get bigger? Image-based recognition systems have to be probabilistic, with a certain amount of give, or they won’t work at all.

In fact, when the security thresholds are set too high, the committee found that the sheer number of false alarms led users to ignore them altogether — definitely a dangerous result, but one familiar to anyone who’s disabled an uncooperative smoke alarm or software “security feature.” And even in such high-security cases, an individual’s biometric traits can be publicly known or accessed, in much more prosaic and less gruesome ways than the cinematic fantasy of cutting off a hand or pulling out an eyeball.

Nope — the biometric future probably isn’t a world of impregnable security corridors protected by perfect technology that only the perfect hack can defeat. Instead, it’s a media player that (90% of the time) knows your son likes Curious George more than your Office spreadsheets. Actually, that isn’t too bad.

Image via US Patent and Trademark Office

Apple granted patent for handheld that recognizes your hands [Engadget]
United States Patent 7,800,592 (Sept 21, 2010) [USPTA]
Automated Biometric Recognition Technologies ‘Inherently Fallible,’ Better Science Base Needed (Press Release) [National Research Council]
Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunities (Full Report) [National Research Council]

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Gadget Lab Podcast: Facebook Phone, Pod Wars and Athletic Robots

In this week’s Gadget Lab podcast, the crew speculates about the rumored Facebook phone, aka Mark Zuckerberg’s plan for world domination. Adding to the rumors, yours truly blurts out a tip from a source about Facebook developing an all-in-one virtual identity that you’ll use not just to connect with friends, but maybe even buy things. How awesome would that be?

runMobileCompatibilityScript(‘myExperience617189013001′, ‘anId’);brightcove.createExperiences();

Speaking of money: People who have a lot of it tend to get nasty with lawyers. That’s the case for Daniel Kokin, who’s going to trial with Apple to fight over the word “Pod.” Kokin’s startup Sector Labs is trying to brand a video projector “VideoPod,” and Apple’s claiming that Kokin’s usage of that magical three-letter word could get people confused about the famous iPod player.

Wrapping up the podcast, Priya Ganapati tells a story about a robot taking on the challenge of walking 300 miles from Tokyo to Kyoto.

Like the show? You can also get theGadget Lab video podcast via iTunes, or if you dont want to be distracted by our unholy on-camera talent, check out theGadget Lab audio podcast. Prefer RSS? You can subscribe to the Gadget Labvideo oraudio podcast feeds

Or listen to the audio here:

Gadget Lab audio podcast #90

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on September 24, 2010

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Apple, Startup Go to Trial Over ‘Pod’ Trademark

Apple is scheduled to go to trial with a startup to fight over a three-letter word: Pod.

The trademark battle centers on independent entrepreneur Daniel Kokin (right), founder of startup Sector Labs, and his video projector in development called Video Pod.Apple had previously filed oppositions against Kokin’s usage of “Pod,” alleging that it would cause customers to confuse it with Apple’s iPod products.

Wired.com originally reported on the early developments of Kokin’s trademark battle with Apple in early 2009, and now the two parties are finally set to go to trial over the next month.

“My team started working on the Video Pod in 2000, and it took us years to go from prototype to funded,” Kokin said. “At that time, Apple didnt even enter our minds as a competitor. Now its 2010 and I still dont think Apple is interested in video projection, but Im supposed to rename our product because Apple also uses ‘pod’?

This trademark fight is nothing personal: Apple has historically filed oppositions against small tech-related businesses attempting to use “Pod” in their product names. Names that have come under fire include MyPodder, TightPod, PodShow, and even Podium. Sector Labs is the only company to go to trial with Apple over using the “Pod” branding.

Ana Christian, Kokin’s lawyer, says the fight is about more than allowing small businesses to use “Pod” in their product names. She noted a trend in the tech industry, in which large corporations have been attempting to assume ownership of ordinary words. For example, Facebook recently filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Teachbook over usage of the word “book.”

“I’m trying to look at it on the big picture,” said Ana Christian, lead counsel representing Sector Labs. “What I’m hoping to do with this case is to really reach a lot broader of an audience and make it so entrepreneurs and small businesses can use the English language as they see fit in branding their products.”

Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Apple and Sector Labs are undergoing a paper trial, in which each party has 30 days to gather and present evidence in paper form, to be submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Apple filed its 873-page paper [pdf] on Sept. 20, and Sector Labs’ testimony begins Oct. 18.

Photos: Jon Snyder/Wired.com, courtesy of Daniel Kokin

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Crank That iPod: Hearing Loss Rates Lower Than Thought

By Jacqui Cheng

We all surely remember what our parents drilled into our brains about listening to loud music: turn that sh*t down or you’ll go deaf! As it turns out, the instance of young people suffering from hearing loss thanks to loud music may be much lower than previously believed, according to a new report published in theJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Although the latest findings go against recent research, the researchers warned that we should still be cautious of our exposure to loud noises over time.

The paper’s authors, from the University of Minnesota, believe that conventional hearing tests are producing false positives when measuring low levels of hearing loss in children and teenagers. According to U of M Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences professor Bert Schlauch, who headed the study, 10 percent or more of children are falsely identified as having noise-related hearing loss this way.

The team also used computer simulations to estimate rates of false positives and determined that it’s still possible to get reasonable estimates of the prevalence of hearing loss. These results are consistent with the findings published in theJournal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) last month, which suggested that kids and teenagersdo suffer higher rates of hearing loss as a result of exposure to loud noises.

They then demonstrated this in action via a study that doesn’t appear in the paper. Schlauch’s team tested the U of M marching band using the traditional methods, and diagnosed 15 percent of them with “apparent noise induced hearing loss.” However, after following them for a year, more than half of the diagnosed hearing losses appeared to go awaya finding that the team says is consistent with measurement error.

Concerns about childhood hearing loss have been amplified in recent years thanks to the proliferation of personal music players. In 2006,Apple was sued for selling a devicethe iPodthatcould result in hearing loss, even though the plaintiff in that case did not claim to have suffered any kind of hearing loss of his own. That case waseventually dismissed because an iPod can be used in a manner that wouldn’t cause hearing loss, but debates about whether music playersneed lower default music settings have stayed strong.

Even though the real problem may be far lower than what theJAMA study claimed, the U of M researchers warn that we shouldn’t just start cranking our iPods back up again.

“Our findings do not mean that people should not be concerned about exposure to loud sounds, such as those from personal stereo devices, live music concerts or gun fire,” Schlauch said. “The damage may build up over time and not appear until a person is older. For all sounds, the risk increases the more intense the sound and the longer the exposure, particularly from sustained or continuous sounds.”

Photo: Thomas Hawk/Flickr

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on September 20, 2010

Tags: , , , , ,

Gadget Lab Podcast: Ninja Steve Jobs, iPod Nano, Veebeam

In this week’s Gadget Lab podcast, Dylan Tweney and yours truly geek out about the potential for Steve Jobs to be a ninja, in reference to a bogus news report published by Bloomberg about the CEO attempting to smuggle ninja stars from Japan.

Apple said it never happened, but who knows maybe Steve’s just really good at hiding shuriken, like a real ninja would be?

runMobileCompatibilityScript(‘myExperience610705512001′, ‘anId’);brightcove.createExperiences();

In more serious news, we’ve had some hands-on time with the new iPod Nano, a touchscreen media player that might even make a decent wristwatch. (Dylan’s full review on the Nano will be published soon.)

Speaking of publishing, we’re currently holding an “iPhoneography” contest, asking readers to submit their most impressive smartphone photos. There have already been a bunch of great submissions. Keep them coming! We’ll feature the best art here on Wired so you can show off to your friends.

Still images are cool, but the world of video is getting plenty interesting with gadgets like the Veebeam, a streaming media player that wirelessly hooks up your computer to a TV. Sounds like an intriguing solution for fans of online video services like Hulu or Netflix.

Like the show? You can also get theGadget Lab video podcast via iTunes, or if you dont want to be distracted by our unholy on-camera talent, check out theGadget Lab audio podcast. Prefer RSS? You can subscribe to the Gadget Labvideo oraudio podcast feeds

Or listen to the audio here:

Gadget Lab audio podcast #89

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on September 17, 2010

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Stephen Fry and Our Transmedia Reading Future

Actor/comedian/intellectual/newspaper columnist/quiz-show host/techno-bibliophile Stephen Fry’s new autobiography The Fry Chronicles is available in several different editions: hardcover, paperback, and Kindle, naturally, but also an enhanced book in Apple’s iBooks store and most intriguingly, an interactive application called myFry for iPhone/iPod Touch and the iPad.

This signals something new. The mere fact of bundling a book as an application is old hat; there was a time, after all, before the Kindle and iBooks apps, when most apps for the iPhone were books. As the video above shows, though, myFry provides both the metadata and interface necessary to read the book nonlinearly — a synthesis of the familiar (flipping through the pages, jumping to any point one likes, not just a chapter head) and the new (sorting data by content tags rather than chapter titles or page numbers; following associative rather than sequential threads).

Alas, myFry is currently not available in the US; in the UK, it costs about 8 pounds, or about $12.50. Also, it’s not currently a universal application, meaning that iPhone and iPad users would have to purchase the application separately for each device.

As for other e-book formats, the iBook version of The Fry Chronicles is organized in the familiar manner, but enhanced with video clips, mostly of the author himself, hyperlinks, and other multimedia. The Kindle e-book, like the print versions, consist of the familiar rows of text + occasional images book-readers have come to know and love for ages.

In the video below, Fry justifies his (and his publisher Penguin’s) approach to e-publishing, and articulates his vision of the future of books: “I think the point is not why I’ve done this, but really why anybody wouldn’t do it now.”

Fry’s embrace of electronic reading is significant in no small part because of the depth of his knowledge of the history of print. In 2008 he made and starred in a BBC documentary on Johannes Gutenberg and the printing press, titled The Machine That Made Us. He’s also a novelist, a journalist, and a celebrated narrator of audiobooks. There are few public figures with the kind of total media experience that he has, both as a performer and thinker.

The myFry application does have its critics. Gavin C. Pugh, a writer for NextRead and FutureBook, complains:

I like a book to look like a book. I like the text to be formatted paragraphs that are indented unless you need to show a scene-break. If they are formatted like a webpage as Penguin have chosen to do here it changes the flow, at least for me. I also like to see each page turn.

Instead each section is presented as a webpage not only in formatting but in scrolling. And it does spoil the flow. Readers tend to scan webpages but absorb books (or things that look like books). How do I know the difference? I downloaded the sample Kindle and iBook versions. I didn’t feel any connection with app but when I started reading the Kindle version my finger ended up hovering over ‘buy’ option

The Kindle version, too, can be read on any device that supports the Kindle app; Pugh appreciates the multimedia enhancements of the iBook version, but laments that it’s limited to iDevices. Chris Matthews at TeleRead adds that the myFry app “does seem a bit expensive for what you get.”

It’s no longer only print aficionados who are resisting the next generation of e-books; experienced digital readers are protesting too, in the name of price, cross-platform portability, and book-specific standards. Meanwhile, other digital readers are waiting for something new; a book designed specifically not only for digital reading but for their device, that takes advantage of all of its strengths to present an innovative reading experience.

I see one potential solution to this impasse: transmedia bundling.

By transmedia, in this instance, I mean simply that different or derivative versions of the same object exist in different media formats. In this case, it’s printed books, audiobooks, enhanced and plain-vanilla e-books, and software applications. It could also include web sites, video games, posters, licensed merchandise, and so forth.

The movie industry has been extremely savvy about bundling its transmedia products — at least after films leave the theater. You can buy a deluxe edition of a film and receive a DVD, a Blu-ray disc, a booklet, an interactive game, a digital file of the film for your computer or media player, and other accessories, for a single price, usually not significantly more than if you had purchased just the DVD.

The book publishing industry hasn’t followed their lead. Instead, every product is treated discretely, released along different production schedules. Moreover, the industry has generally assumed that every e-book sold is a print sale lost — that the few readers interested in reading a book in both a print and electronic version will gladly pay full-price for both.

Now, however, we’re at the point where iBooks, iPad, and Kindle are not offering different scans of the same book, but genuinely different products — each of which may appeal to different readers, but also to the same reader differently depending on context.

The devices — especially dedicated e-readers — have also reached the point where it’s not uncommon for users to have a personal computer, a tablet, an e-reader, a smartphone, and a print library. But there is no way, short of purchasing a book and scanning it yourself, to read the same book in even a handful of those distinct contexts without spending a fortune.

Suppose instead that Penguin offered a deluxe hardcover version of Fry’s book for $35. Or even $50. (Amazon UK is currently selling the hardcover for 9 pounds, or about $14.) With this, you would get:

  • A handsome slipcover;
  • A finely printed book;
  • An audiobook, on either CD or mp3;
  • An e-book, in the format of your choice;
  • A software application, for the OS (mobile or otherwise) of your choice;
  • A commemorative flag, T-shirt, poster, and/or pin.

In other words, instead of punishing your transmedia collectors, reward and embrace them. Let bibliophiles strive to outdo one another with the audacity of cinephiles. Make the release of a new book an event.

Ripping compact discs provided a natural way to enjoy music anywhere; DVDs quickly did the same for movies. Now even Blu-ray’s DRM days are dwindling. In all of these cases, the industry lagged and fretted about privacy while users found and shared solutions on their own.

That’s already beginning with books. This won’t be the end.

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Inevitable Strap Turns iPod Nano into a Watch

This accessory was as inevitable as the hangover that follows the annual Gadget Lab post-CES party (where we enjoy a fabulous dinner at Denny’s followed by cheap wine sipped from stolen paper-cups in the liquor-store car-park). As soon as we saw the new iPod Nano’s clock-face app, we knew there would be a wrist-strap for it. We weren’t disappointed.

The strap has the pun-tastic name Rock Band and comes from a company called iLoveHandles. The Nano can be set to use the clock as its lock-screen, so a simple touch is enough to bring up the face and check the time. The Rock Band is a wrist-strap onto which the Nano clips (it has the same clip on its back as the Shuffle) and becomes an oversized wristwatch. Well, oversized if you’re not used to hefting a tacky chunk of gold Rolex on your arm, that is.

It’s a great idea, and not really that much different than the sports armbands that have held Nanos to the upper-arms of sporty people for years. I guess that if you were actually going to listen to music while wearing this, you’d need to run the cable up a sleeve to stop it constantly snagging, but that’s not big deal.

The Rock Band is $20, and is surely only the first in what will be a rather crowded market.

Rock Band product page [iLoveHandles. Thanks, Avik!]

Follow us for real-time tech news: Charlie Sorrel and Gadget Lab on Twitter.

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on September 10, 2010

Tags: , , , ,

iPod Shuffle Gets Naked, And It Wasn’t Easy

Our nimble friends at iFixit have already pried open the new iPod Shuffle that Apple just announced last week. The verdict: The Shuffle is a tightly packed contraption of extremely puny parts and connectors, making it very difficult to disassemble for repairs.

Most notably, the Shuffle is powered by a puny 3.7-volt battery capable of pumping out 15 hours of audio playback, according to Apple’s specifications page. The battery is soldered onto the logic board (pictured below), which will make replacing it a real challengeif the Shuffle ever completely runs out of juice.

The click wheel is attached to the logic board with a ribbon cable, and even that’s a chore to disconnect: the connector is only a wee 1/8 of an inch wide.

So if you’re a beginner, don’t even attempt to crack this gadget open. For the brave souls, iFixit has a complete teardown tutorial with more pictures.

Photos courtesy of iFixit

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

New iPod Touch Has a Vibrator

Steve Jobs wasn’t kidding when he called the iPod Touch the “iPhone without a phone”. We have been calling it that for years, of course, but with each iteration the two iOS devices get closer and closer in terms of features. Now a vibrating alert has been added to the the Touch.

The first iPod Touch was a chunky slab of metal and glass, and didn’t even come with a hardware volume-control. As the product-line has evolved, Apple has added not only a volume switch but a speaker (the latest version has a proper speaker, not the tinny thing hidden in the headphone socket like last year’s model), a pair of cameras, a gyroscope and a microphone. The only the Touch now lacks are the cellular radio, the GPS and the mute-switch on the side.

The vibrator shows up as an alert for FaceTime on the iPod accessibility page:

If somebody wants to start a video call with you, youll receive an invitation along with a vibrating alert on your iPod touch asking you to join.

The obvious use though (no, not that one) is for games. Tactile feedback has been around on bigger consoles for years, and as the Touch is being pushed as a gaming device, adding in a vibrator seems like a great idea.

Which makes me wonder how long it will be before the Touch really is a phone-less iPhone. Is it possible that the next step is to add in cellular data, just like the iPad 3G, leaving out only the actual telephony hardware? That would still suit Job’s other nickname for the Touch, which is the “iPhone without a contract.” Couple that with FaceTime and who needs a cellphone anyway?

Video calling with FaceTime [Apple via MacRumors]

Photo: FCC

Follow us for real-time tech news: Charlie Sorrel and Gadget Lab on Twitter.

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Gadget Lab Podcast: iPods, Apple TV and Samsung’s Galaxy Tab

runMobileCompatibilityScript(‘myExperience602079690001′, ‘anId’);brightcove.createExperiences();

This week’s episode of the Gadget Lab podcast is heavy on fruits. High on vitamin A, Dylan Tweney gushes over the pluot, a plum-apricot hybrid, while yours truly dishes out this week’s announcements of brand new Apple gear.

Apple’s iPod family all scored major upgrades. The iPod Nano has become a puny touchscreen badge with a built-in clip that should be ideal for athletes, and the iPod Touch is now up to par with the iPhone 4. The iPod Shuffle was refreshed as well also a badge-like clippable form factor, but with the traditional click wheel rather than a touchscreen.

Apple also announced a brand new Apple TV that’s about a quarter of the size of its predecessor. It streams movie and television rentals, but it faces one major limitation: only two television networks (Fox and ABC) are on board to offer programs for the device. For now, it’s not an adequate replacement for cable TV.

However, in a future software update, iOS devices will be able to wirelessly stream their iTunes videos and music onto the Apple TV by using a feature called “AirPlay.” We ponder on the potential for Apple to reshape the TV industry if the company eventually allows you to beam content from third-party iOS apps (such as Hulu) onto the Apple TV. It’s wishful thinking, but not an impossibility.

Finally, Samsung has officially launched a tablet to compete with Apple’s iPad. The Samsung Galaxy Tab is a 7-inch touchscreen tablet powered by Android OS 2.2, meaning it supports Adobe Flash. We share our impressions of the device after some hands-on testing.

Oh, and those pluots? They come from Frog Hollow Farm, and they really are delicious.

Like the show? You can also get theGadget Lab video podcast via iTunes, or if you dont want to be distracted by our smiling faces, check out theGadget Lab audio podcast. Prefer RSS? You can subscribe to the Gadget Labvideo oraudio podcast feeds

Or listen to the audio here:

Gadget Lab audio podcast #87

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on September 6, 2010

Tags: , , , , , , ,

DIY Friday: Charge Your iPhone With AAs or Solar Power

Limor Fried’s MintyBoost project is a great example of DIY and commercial tech working together. Take an Altoids tin, a couple of AA batteries, and some very smart hackery, and you’ve got a lightweight USB charger that you can use to charge/run your handheld iWhatever, or almost any other phone, camera, or small device that can take a charge off USB power.

Reverse engineering Apple’s secret charging methods from adafruit industries on Vimeo.

Clive Thompson profiled Fried and her company Adafruit Industries as part of a 2008 feature in Wired on “open source hardware.” The idea is that hackers like Fried can use what they find out about consumer devices to make and sell their own products, but also to produce DIY kits and share information with others who then build their own projects.

As a case study in the value of sharing this information, consider Rob Scott. Before he took his son on a week-long bike trip, he used Fried’s schematic to hack together what turns out to be a really striking-looking solar charger for his son’s iPod.

It’s always nice to see what the maker community is doing to accessorize their retail gadgets; the results aren’t always super-polished, but they generally solve real problems in important use cases that don’t get addressed by manufacturers, either because they’re too unusual or they can’t be easily solved by more plugs, more peripherals, more complex devices that cost a lot of money. And in turn, we all find out a little bit more about how these magical devices get put together and how they work.

See Also:

  • DIY Graphing Calculator Is Built From Open Source Hardware
  • Why Arduino Is a Hit With Hardware Hackers
  • Beautifully Hypnotic Video Details Canon Macro Lens Hack
  • Hacker Stuffs MiFi Inside iPad, Ruins it in the Process

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

IPADock, The Mother of All Desktop Docks

IPADock. Its name may sound more like a place to keep your iRacehorses, but the curiously-capitalized accessory is probably the most useful desktop gadget ever. Plug it into a computer and you can charge and sync a pair of iPads, four iPhones, and various combinations thereof. A universal dock-port can be fitted with the adapter from any iPod, from Nano to Touch, and then things start to get even handier.

Stacked up around the back are slots for SD-cards, MemorySticks, CompactFlash cards and a three-port USB-hub. In short, pretty much anything you might want to dock on your desktop will be served by this surprisingly good-looking and compact device.

The price? $70, although you’ll be ordering it from Japan if you want one.

iPADock product page [Photofast via Cult of Mac's John Brownlee. Thanks, Pedro!]

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Photo Shows iPod Touch with Camera. Again

If you thought that things would be quiet in the world of Apple news until the yearly September iPod event, you’d be wrong. The rumors have already begun. Hardmac claims to have pictures of a next-gen iPod Touch with a rear-facing camera and flash. Rather than the usual blurry-cam picture we expect for leaks, it is a nice Apple Store-ready hero-shot. It is also, weirdly, in a case.

It’s almost certain that the new Touch will have a camera. We also know that the iPhone’s camera is pretty big, and would only just fit into the Touch, so seeing it all the way up at the corner of the Touch – its thinnest part – seems odd. So too, does the lack of a FaceTime-capable front-facing camera, but maybe that’s being saved for next-year’s model.

There’s not really much to get excited about here. The most interesting question, and the one that no spy-shot will answer, is whether or not the iPod Touch will use Apple’s A4 processor. I’d say it’s pretty likely: there are advantages of cost by using the same processor in all iDevices, as well as making things a lot easier for developers, who only have to write for one powerful processor, and two screen sizes (if the iPod Touch gets the Retina Display, that is).

One thing we do know, though, is that there will be new iPod models sometime in September, just like every year. Expect analysts to start “predicting” this fact very soon.

Pictures of the iPod Touch 4… well, almost [Hardmac]

Follow us for real-time tech news: Charlie Sorrel and Gadget Lab on Twitter.

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

Pod Porter, a 3D-Printed iPod Shuffle Necklace

The current iPod Shuffle is tiny to the point of being hard to use. In fact, lose or break the Apple earbuds and you’re screwed, unable to control playback without the in-line remote in the cable. It is cool-looking though, in a how-the-hell-do-they-fit-an-iPod-in-there? kind of way.

Now you can make it even cooler-looking with the lamely-named Pod Porter necklace, which despite all good sense seems to be for both men and women. The necklace is a velvet-finish, 3D printed polyamide loop. The iPod plugs into one end and the headphone cable threads around the loop to exit at the other end. The result is a tangle-free unit that keeps cables and everything else above the neckline, and can be worn whilst naked, Patrick Bateman-style.

As someone who has killed countless pairs of expensive headphones by catching cords on street-furniture as I dance through the city, I can appreciate the utility. But as a gadget writer and nerd, I like the manufacturing process even more. The Pod Porter exists as a 3D computer model designed by Michiel Cornelissen and resides on the servers of Shapeways, the online 3D printing service. When you order, your necklace is cranked out of the printer and mailed to you. This feels a lot like the future.

The Pod Porter costs $27 and comes in black, white, magenta, blue and green to match your iPod Shuffle.

Pod Porter [Michiel Cornelissen]

Pod porter – neckband for iPod shuffle [Shapeways]

Follow us for real-time tech news: Charlie Sorrel and Gadget Lab on Twitter.

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

UK Retailer Leaks New iPod Touch Details: Camera, FaceTime

UK retail giant John Lewis has leaked details of a new iPod Touch. The company’s audio and telecoms buyer, Rob Hennessey, detailed the new iPod in a Christmas sales presentation.

The details of the new iPod will come as no surprise to regular readers: it is essentially an iPhone 4 without the phone. But the fact that it has been revealed by somebody so high up in John Lewis makes this a little more juicy.

The details: The new iPod will be announced in September (as always) and will have a 5MP camera with a flash, a gyroscope (for gaming) and FaceTime over Wi-Fi (suggesting it’ll also get the front-facing camera from the iPhone 4). Oddly, there is no mention of the retina display.

As I said, all of this was pretty obvious, but one of Hennessey’s points shows just how big the Wi-Fi only FaceTime could get. The Touch will be targeted at kids and teenagers, and for them, FaceTime will be a way to talk to each other free (it will also be a pretty good way to cheat on tests).

The report comes by way of UK tech blog Pocket Lint, which also managed to get hold of the picture above. We suspect Mr. Hennessey will be getting a call from Apple any time now.

New Apple iPod in September – John Lewis spills the beans[Pocket Lint]

Source:wired.com

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by Journalist on July 8, 2010

Tags: , , , ,