Hands on with the Gyration Air Mouse

airmouse-4.jpg

Shortly after we covered the Logitech VX Nano Notebook Mouse, the guys from Gyration got in touch to tell us about their Air Mouse, a mini travel mouse with a twist: it works without a table. Yesterday FedEx dropped one off and we have been playing around with it.

The Air Mouse looks just like a regular mouse but it has a couple of additions. Inside there is a gyroscope, which detects motion in three dimensions. And outside, on the bottom, there is a big switch, which triggers the in-air mode. It’s a little smaller than the Logitech, as you can see in the picture. It’s also slightly lighter, and feels less solid in the hand.

Although it is aimed at travel use, I put it to test in the living room. I have just set up an old G5 PowerMac for use as a media center, so it seemed the perfect place to try it out. A cordless mouse is obviously better than a tethered one when you are kicking back on the couch, so a mouse that doesn’t even need a surface would seem to be even better.

airmouse-1.jpg

First, in went the dongle. The Air uses the 2.4GHz wavelength instead of Bluetooth, just like the Logitech, which means faster response and less RF interference. The dongle is big, though. On a desktop computer, size doesn’t matter, but for traveling, it certainly sticks out from the side of your laptop. The tiny Logitech plug’n'forget nubbin in much better. Fortunately, there is space inside the mouse to hold the dongle.

When I plugged the USB stick in, the Mac immediately recognised it as a keyboard, and opened up this screen:

kb-quiz.jpg

I closed the window and tried moving the mouse around. Nothing. I checked that the batteries (supplied) were in the right way, and hit the “connect” switch on the bottom of the mouse. Still nothing. There was nothing for it but to look at the instructions, where I found that you have to hit the “connect” switch on the USB receiver. After that, everything worked fine. A clear case of pebkac.

Gyration says that the mouse has limited use on the Mac — it just shows up as a regular USB mouse. The site also tells us that the right button won’t work. This may be some inside jibe at Apple’s frankly ridiculous penchant for single-button mice (thankfully now cured) but the right button actually works fine, along with the scroll wheel and the scroll wheel button.

The other three buttons on the mouse’s back were not recognized, though. This is odd, as OS X has support for multi-button mice built in. If you are using Windows, the supplied driver software should take care of everything, as well as offering some gesture based controls for more complex interaction (zoom, text highlighting).

airmouse-2.jpg

Lifting it off the desk, things continued to work. You need to press and hold the trigger on the bottom to engage the drive, as it were. A double click will keep it switched on. This helps, as those with big hands may have trouble keeping the bottom button pressed while manipulating the regular mouse buttons up top. The trouble here is that once you get to the edge of the screen, you can keep on moving the mouse and — of course — the pointer remains where it is. Moving back again starts the pointer moving, but now you are slightly skewed, as the mouse uses relative and not absolute positioning.

airmouse-3.jpg

The tracking, though, is accurate and smooth. It takes a little getting used to — moving the mouse left and right does nothing. You need to treat it like a conductor’s baton and point at the part of the screen you want. Ironically, the mouse tracks better in the air than it does on the table, probably because it uses a blue light instead of a laser. One nice touch: If you are in “air” mode and put the mouse down, it switches back to normal mode. Neat.

The Air Mouse is great as a remote for a media center, and would also work for presentations. As a normal, deskbound mouse it fares less well, giving a slightly jerky response to normal movements. The price is $100.

Product page [Gyration]

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by admin on October 8, 2008

Tags: , , , , ,

Hands On With The BlackBerry Storm

Dsc_0871_copy_2

If you read the tech blogs (especially G-Lab) with any degree of frequency then you’re already familiar with the long and winding rumor mill that has been the touchscreen BlackBerry. Yesterday, folks from RIM and Verizon stopped by the Wired offices to squelch those rumors and to give us a hands-on with touch enabled device that they have dubbed the Storm.

To put it eloquently, we’ve seen a butt-load of handset makers jump on the iClone bandwagon since Apple’s device was announced in 2007. And without exception, every single attempt has failed to come close to meeting the iPhone’s nearly mythic combination of intuitive UI, responsive touchscreen, and gorgeous hardware. The Storm, though, actually gets closest of any device we’ve ever laid hands on. And in one critical area it — get ready for it — it actually beats the iPhone.

Do you need a mop because we just blew your mind? Here let us explain what features make this device so cranium busting:

4-inch ClickThrough Touchscreen: This is the Storm’s prime-time killer feature and the reason why it gives the iPhone a run for its money.  The Storm’s screen — like the iPhone’s — is sensitive to the bioelectric pulses in your fingertips. It’s responsive, bright, and requires only a very delicate touch. But when you want to select something, be it anything from music application to a text message, you have to press down on that screen until it clicks. It’s not much — essentially it’s the same sensation you get when clicking with your mouse — but it makes a world of difference. There’s no ambiguity to button presses. You know exactly what key you have pushed and what application you have selected. Text messaging is a breeze — I was able to compose a lengthy detailed SMS without a single typo. That’s a feat I have yet to accomplish with the iPhone.

Cut and Paste: Yes, Virginia there is text editing. Be prepared to access Word and PowerPoint files on the fly.

World Phone Capability: The Storm will operate on Quad-Band: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900MHz GSM/GPRS/EDGE networks Single-Band: 2100 MHz UMTS/HSPA networks  and Dual-Band: 800/1900 MHz CDMA/EVDO Rev A networks. Meaning? It’s compatible with virtually every single network on earth.

3.2 MP Camera: No real surprise here, but the unit tales some very good pics along with sharp video and clear audio.

Dsc_0880_copy

The Storm should be called the Hurricane. It’s that heavy. The
device tips the scales at 5.46 ounces and feels even beefier when
shoved in a pocket. It also lacks both video out and Wi-Fi — Verizon
apparently wants you to use its data plan and nothing else. But that
nearly doesn’t matter, the ClickThrough screen is a flash of genius and
more than makes up (upon first impression at least) for any minor
quibble that we might have for the phone.

To say the Storm isn’t a direct response to the iPhone would be
poopy- pants childish. But it’s hard to say if the Storm will eclipse
the iPhone in terms of performance, applications, or even cultural
cache.

Despite having some superior features, I doubt it will have the same
impact on the cellular landscape that the iPhone has. But this is still
the most fully realized version of a touch compatible iPhone competitor
the Lab has seen yet. If the finished product is fully baked and
competitively priced, Cupertino might be wise to worry. My biggest
question? Will future versions of the iPhone crib from the Storm’s
ClickThrough feature or will Steve just bite his lip, close his eyes,
and just try to weather the Storm? 

No pricing or availability has been announced as of yet. Verizon and
RIM both assured us that it would be out before December 25th of this
year. Once we get a fully realized version in, expect a review in no
time, Labbers.

(Photos by Daniel Salo for Wired.com)

Posted under Gadget Reviews

This post was written by admin on October 8, 2008

Tags: , ,